<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SAH Commons | William Brooks | Activity</title>
	<link>https://sah.hcommons.org/members/wfbrooks/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://sah.hcommons.org/members/wfbrooks/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for William Brooks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 16:18:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=10.6.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2aa7a9b4295a2a172ed4a78b739e48c9</guid>
				<title>William Brooks&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1886948/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2024 13:17:39 -0400</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8f0a81338ff2458cfb232e1aee24f792</guid>
				<title>William Brooks deposited In re: ‘Experimental Music’</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1669524/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 22:31:42 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Cage is universally associated with the phrase experimental music. But what did that phrase mean, for Cage and for Cage’s predecessors? I begin with Cage and Lejaren Hiller, both writing important texts on ‘experimental music’ in 1959. From there, I trace the phrase backwards, eventually reaching Emile Zola, Gertrude Stein, and William James&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1669524"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1669524/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cfd1b9bc05c9bcd56b6e91a0fdf0283a</guid>
				<title>William Brooks deposited In re: Experimental Analysis</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1669523/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 22:28:40 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article begins by considering the interaction of notation and analysis by means of a comparison of scores from the 1950s. This discussion leads to the domains of error, value, and ethics. An ‘experimental’ mode of analysis is proposed, which takes taxonomy and statistics as a basis; from this one acquires an understanding that is obs&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1669523"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1669523/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c1313bf8523ea98822d0c6014be2ad08</guid>
				<title>William Brooks deposited In Re: Experimental Education</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1669522/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 22:24:56 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This chapter appeared in a volume that summarized the results of the three-year &#8220;Patterns of Intuition&#8221; project that Gerhard Nierhaus and others directed: the project investigated the creative act of composing by means of algorithmic composition. Central to the investigation were the compositional strategies of twelve composers, which were&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1669522"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1669522/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>